Do you believe the driving age should be raised? Why or why not?
May you use the reference down below
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reference 1:
Raise the driving age. That radical idea is gaining
momentum in the fight to save the lives of teenage
driversthe most dangerous on the USA’s roadsand
their passengers.
Brain and auto safety experts fear that 16-year-olds, the
youngest drivers licensed in most states, are too immature to
handle today’s cars and roadway risks.
New findings from brain researchers at the National
Institutes of Health explain for the first time why efforts to
protect the youngest drivers usually fail. The weak link: what’s
called “the executive branch” of the teen brainthe part
that weighs risks, makes judgments and controls impulsive
behavior.
Scientists at the NIH campus in Bethesda, Md., have
found that this vital area develops through the teenage years and isn’t fully mature until age 25. One 16-year-old’s brain
might be more developed than another 18-year-old’s, just as a
younger teen might be taller than an older one. But evidence
is mounting that a 16-year-old’s brain is generally far less
developed than those of teens just a little older.
The research seems to help explain why 16-year-old
drivers crash at far higher rates than older teens. The studies
have convinced a growing number of safety experts that
16-year-olds are too young to drive safely without supervision.
“Privately, a lot of people in safety think it’s a good idea to
raise the driving age,” says Barbara Harsha, executive director
of the Governors Highway Safety Association. “It’s a topic that
is emerging.”
Americans increasingly favor raising the driving age,
a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll[1] has found. Nearly two-
thirds61%say they think a 16-year-old is too young to
have a driver’s license. Only 37% of those polled thought it was
OK to license 16-year-olds, compared with 50% who thought
so in 1995.
A slight majority, 53%, think teens should be at least 18 to
get a license.
The poll of 1,002 adults, conducted Dec. 17-19, 2004, has
an error margin of +/-3 percentage points.
Many states have begun to raise the age by imposing
restrictions on 16-year-old drivers. Examples: limiting the
number of passengers they can carry or barring late-night
driving. But the idea of flatly forbidding 16-year-olds to drive
without parental supervisionas New Jersey doeshas
run into resistance from many lawmakers and parents around
the country.
Irving Slosberg, a Florida state representative who lost
his 14-year-old daughter in a 1995 crash, says that when he
proposed a law to raise the driving age, other lawmakers
“laughed at me.”
Bill Van Tassel, AAA’s[2] national manager of driving
training programs, hears both sides of the argument. “We
have parents who are pretty much tired of chauffeuring their kids around, and they want their children to be able to drive,”
he says. “Driving is a very emotional issue.”
But safety experts fear inaction could lead to more young
lives lost. Some sound a note of urgency about changing
course. The reason: A record number of American teenagers
will soon be behind the wheel as the peak of the “baby
boomlet” hits driving age.
Already, on average, two people die every day across
the USA in vehicles driven by 16-year-old drivers. One in
five 16-year-olds will have a reportable car crash within the
first year.
In 2003, there were 937 drivers age 16 who were involved
in fatal crashes. In those wrecks, 411 of the 16-year-old drivers
died and 352 of their passengers were killed. Sixteen-year-old
drivers are involved in fatal crashes at a rate nearly five times
the rate of drivers 20 or older.
Gayle Bell, whose 16-year-old daughter, Jessie, rolled her
small car into a Missouri ditch and died in July 2003, says she
used to happily be Jessie’s “ride.” She would give anything for
the chance to drive Jessie again.
“We were always together, but not as much after she got
her license,” Bell says. “If I could bring her back, I’d lasso the
moon.”
Most states have focused their fixes on giving teens more
driving experience before granting them unrestricted licenses.
But the new brain research suggests that a separate factor is
just as crucial: maturity. A new 17- or 18-year-old driver is
considered safer than a new 16-year-old driver.
Even some teens are acknowledging that 16-year-olds
are generally not ready to face the life-threatening risks that
drivers can encounter behind the wheel.
“Raising the driving age from 16 to 17 would benefit
society as a whole,” says Liza Darwin, 17, of Nashville. Though
many parents would be inconvenienced and teens would be
frustrated, she says, “It makes sense to raise the driving age to
save more lives.”
Focus on lawmakers
But those in a position to raise the driving agelegislators in
states throughout the USAhave mostly refused to do so.Adrienne Mandel, a Maryland state legislator, has tried
since 1997 to pass tougher teen driving laws. Even lawmakers who recognize that a higher driving age could save lives,
Mandel notes, resist the notion of having to drive their
16-year-olds to after-school activities that the teens could
drive to themselves.
“Other delegates said, ‘What are you doing? You’re going
to make me drive my kid to the movies on Friday night for
another six months?’ ” Mandel says. “Parents are talking about
inconvenience, and I’m talking about saving lives.”
Yet the USA TODAY poll found that among the general
public, majorities in both suburbs (65%) and urban areas
(60%) favor licensing ages above 16.
While a smaller percentage in rural areas (54%) favor
raising the driving age, experts say it’s striking that majority
support exists even there, considering that teens on farms
often start driving very young to help with workloads.
For those who oppose raising the minimum age, their
argument is often this: Responsible teen drivers shouldn’t be
punished for the mistakes of the small fraction who cause
deadly crashes.
The debate stirs images of reckless teens drag-racing or
driving drunk. But such flagrant misdeeds account for only a
small portion of the fatal actions of 16-year-old drivers. Only
about 10% of the 16-year-old drivers killed in 2003 had blood-
alcohol concentrations of 0.10 or higher, compared with 43%
of 20- to 49-year-old drivers killed, according to the Insurance
Institute for Highway Safety.
Instead, most fatal crashes with 16-year-old drivers (77%)
involved driver errors, especially the kind most common
among novices. Examples: speeding, overcorrecting after
veering off the road, and losing control when facing a roadway
obstacle that a more mature driver would be more likely to
handle safely. That’s the highest percentage of error for any
age group.
For years, researchers suspected that inexperiencethe
bane of any new driverwas mostly to blame for deadly
crashes involving teens. When trouble arose, the theory
went, the young driver simply made the wrong move. But
in recent years, safety researchers have noticed a pattern
emergeone that seems to stem more from immaturity
than from inexperience.”Skills are a minor factor in most cases,” says Allan
Williams, former chief scientist at the insurance institute.
“It’s really attitudes and emotions.”
A peek inside the brain
The NIH brain research suggests that the problem is human
biology. A crucial part of the teen’s brainthe area that peers
ahead and considers consequencesremains undeveloped.
That means careless attitudes and rash emotions often drive
teen decisions, says Jay Giedd, chief of brain imaging in the
child psychiatric unit at the National Institute of Mental
Health, who’s leading the study.
“It all comes down to impulse control,” Giedd says. “The
brain is changing a lot longer than we used to think. And that
part of the brain involved in decision-making and controlling
impulses is among the latest to come on board.”
The teen brain is a paradox. Some areasthose that
control senses, reactions and physical abilitiesare fully
developed in teenagers. “Physically, they should be ruling the
world,” Giedd says. “But (adolescence) is not that great of a
time emotionally.”
Giedd and an international research team have analyzed
4,000 brain scans from 2,000 volunteers to document how
brains evolve as children mature.
In his office at the NIH, Giedd points to an image of a brain on his computer screen that illustrates brain development from childhood to adulthood. As he sets the time lapse in motion, the brain turns blue rapidly in some areas and more slowly in others. One area that’s slow to turn blue which represents development over timeis the right side just over the temple. It’s the spot on the head where a parent might tap a frustrated finger while asking his teen, “What were you thinking?”
This underdeveloped area is called the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex. The underdeveloped blue on Giedd’s screen is where thoughts of long-term consequences spring to consciousness. And in teen after teen, the research team found, it’s not fully mature.
“This is the top rung,” Giedd says. “This is the part of the brain that, in a sense, associates everything. All of our hopes and dreams for the future. All of our memories of the past. Our values. Everything going on in our environment. Everything to make a decision.”
When a smart, talented and very mature teen does something a parent might call “stupid,” Giedd says, it’s this underdeveloped part of the brain that has most likely failed.
“That’s the part of the brain that helps look farther ahead,” he says. “In a sense, increasing the time between impulse and decisions. It seems not to get as good as it’s going to get until age 25.”
This slow process plays a kind of dirty trick on teens, whose hormones are churning. As their bodies turn more adultlike, the hormones encourage more risk-taking and thrill-seeking. That might be nature’s way of helping them leave the nest. But as the hormones fire up the part of the brain that responds to pleasure, known as the limbic system, emotions run high. Those emotions make it hard to quickly form wise judgmentsthe kind drivers must make every day.
That’s also why teens often seem more impetuous than adults. In making decisions, they rely more on the parts of their brain that control emotion. They’re “hotter” when angry and “colder” when sad, Giedd says.
When a teen is traveling 15 to 20 miles per hour over the speed limit, the part of his or her brain that processes a thrill is working brilliantly. But the part that warns of negative consequences? It’s all but useless.”It may not seem that fast to them,” Giedd says, because
they’re not weighing the same factors an adult might. They’re
not asking themselves, he says, ” ‘Should I go fast or not?’ And
dying is not really part of the equation.”
Precisely how brain development plays out on the roads
has yet to be studied. Giedd says brain scans of teens in
driving simulations might tell researchers exactly what’s
going on in their heads. That could lead to better training
and a clearer understanding of which teens are ready to make
critical driving decisions.
In theory, a teen’s brain could eventually be scanned to
determine whether he or she was neurologically fit to drive.
But Giedd says that ethical crossroad is too radical to seriously
consider today. “We are just at the threshold of this,” he says.
Finding explanations
The new insights into the teen brain might help explain
why efforts to protect young drivers, ranging from driver
education to laws that restrict teen driving, have had only
modest success. With the judgment center of the teen brain
not fully developed, parents and states must struggle to instill
decision-making skills in still-immature drivers.
In nearly every state, 16-year-old drivers face limits known
as “graduated licensing” rules. These restrictions vary. But
typically, they bar 16-year-olds from carrying other teen
passengers, driving at night or driving alone until they have
driven a certain number of hours under parental supervision.
These states have, in effect, already raised their driving
age. Safety experts say lives have been saved as a result. But
it’s mostly left to parents to enforce the restrictions, and the
evidence suggests enforcement has been weak.
Teens probably appear to their parents at the dinner table
to be more in control than they are behind the wheel. They
might recite perfectly the risks of speeding, drinking and
driving or distractions, such as carrying passengers or talking
on a cell phone, Giedd says. But their brains are built to learn
more from example.
For teenagers, years of watching parents drive after
downing a few glasses of wine or while chatting on a cell
phone might make a deeper imprint than a lecture from a
driver education teacher.The brain research raises this question: How well can teen
brains respond to the stresses of driving?
More research on teen driving decisions is needed, safety
advocates say, before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
And more public support is probably needed before politicians
would seriously consider raising the driving age.
In the 1980s, Congress pressured states to raise their legal
age to buy alcohol to 21. The goal was to stop teens from
crossing borders to buy alcohol, after reports of drunken
teens dying in auto crashes. Fueled by groups such as Mothers
Against Drunk Driving, public support for stricter laws grew
until Congress forced a rise in the drinking age.
Those laws have saved an estimated 20,000 lives in the past
20 years. Yet safety advocates say politicians remain generally
unwilling to raise the driving age.
“If this were forced on the states, it would not be accepted
very well,” Harsha says. “What it usually takes for politicians
to change their minds is a series of crashes involving young
people. When enough of those kind of things happen, then
politicians are more likely to be open to other suggestions.”
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reference 2:
Article by Allison Aubrey
Terrified to see your teenager behind the wheel? You’re
not alone. But a new study finds tougher state licensing
laws have led to a decrease in fatal accidents, at least among
16-year-olds. That’s the good news.
But here’s the rub. Some kids are waiting until they’re
18-years-old to get their driver’s licenses. At this point, they’re
considered adults, and they don’t have to jump through the
hoops required of younger teens. They can opt out of driver’s
ed. And they are not subject to nighttime driving restrictions
or passenger restrictions.
“[Older teens] are saying, ‘The heck with your more
complicated process,”‘ says Justin McNaull, director of
state relations for the American Automobile Association.
At 18, teenagers can, in many cases, get their license in a
matter of weeks.
It’s one explanation for the latest findings published in
the Journal of the American Medical Association. Researchers
at the University of North Carolina and the California
Department of Motor Vehicles analyzed more than 130,000
fatal teen crashes over 22 years.
They found that tougher licensing laws have led to 1,348
fewer fatal car crashes involving 16-year-old drivers. But
during the same period, fatal crashes involving 18-year-old
drivers increased. They were behind the wheel in 1,086 more
fatal accidents.
States have made the licensing process more rigorous in
many ways: longer permitting times, driver’s ed requirements,
and restrictions on nighttime driving and carrying fellow
teenage passengers. Experts say all of these requirements help
give teenagers the experience they need on the road. “In the
last 15 years, we’ve made great strides in getting the licensing
process to be better in helping teens get through it
safely,” says McNaull.
California has seen a big drop in 16-year-olds getting their
driver’s license. Back in 1986, 27 percent got licensed. By 2007,
the figure dropped to 14 percent.”We have more novices on the road at 18,”says Scott
Masten of the California DMV and an author of the study.
And some of them may not have enough experience under
their belts to face risky conditions. Masten says this may help
explain the increase in fatal crashes.
It’s not clear whether there are significantly fewer 16-year-
olds behind the wheel in other states because there’s no
national database. But anecdotally, experts see this as a trend.
“There’s a belief that graduated licensing has led to a
delay,”says Anne McCart, a senior vice president at the
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
A survey of teens conducted by the Allstate Foundation
found that there are many reasons teens are delaying the
process of getting a license. Some say they don’t have a car
or can’t afford it. Others report that their parents are not
available to help them, or that they’re too busy with other
activities.
But parents who do want to be more proactive can refer to
the tips the AAA has compiled on how to keep teens behind
the wheel safe. And they might also consider another recent
study, which showed that starting the school day a little bit
later seems to reduce the accident rate for teen drivers.
