1. write the Case proposal about news https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr-25755
Introduction:
*Identify 2-5 key problems (unregistered securities, Ponzi Schemes)
Context and Background:
*SEC, violation GAAP?
2.
After Write the case proposal, create the PowerPonit for the presentation.
ACCT – 818
10/03/2023
Accounting Fraud at Roadrunner Transportation Systems
Roadrunner, a prominent shipping and linguistics enterprise based in the state of Illinois, found itself entangled in a legal dispute with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). On February 14, 2023 the SEC took action against Roadrunner Transportation Systems, accusing them of engaging in deceptive accounting practices over a period of 4 years, ultimately resulting in charges of accounting fraud.
Following an extensive investigation, the SEC uncovered multiple violations committed by Roadrunner. These violations encompassed antitrust regulations, as well as laws pertaining to books, records, reporting, and internal accounting practices. As a consequence, Roadrunner reached a settlement with the SEC, agreeing to pay a substantial fine of $19.5 million. Additionally, the company has committed to refraining from any future involvement in such illicit activities, ensuring compliance with the law and ethical accounting practices going forward.
During the period from 2013-2017. Roadrunner engaged in a series of unethical and illegal practices aimed at manipulating its financial reports. The company deliberately manipulated its earnings to meet prior guidance and projections by improperly deferring expenses and strategically spreading them across different quarters. By doing so, they minimized the impact on their net earnings and avoided the need to write down worthless assets and uncollectible receivables. Additionally, Roadrunner intentionally manipulated the liabilities from acquisitions, using the resulting income to offset expenses. These deceptive practices were carried out with the intentions of concealing from auditors, allowing Roadrunner to continue these illicit activities undetected.
History
In its early days, Roadrunner started as a carrier specializing in long-haul transportation between metropolitan areas. Their primary customers were small businesses shipping less than a truck load of cargo. In 2005, they made the strategic decision to merge with Dawes Transport, forming a power alliance in the transportation industry. This collaboration allowed Roadrunner to expand its capabilities and enhance its services, creating new opportunity for growth and success.
After successfully navigating through the challenges of the Great Recession and going public in 2010, they decided to embark on an expansion spree. The company made the strategic decision to acquire 25 privately help transportation companies over the next few years. This aggressive growth strategy allowed them to significantly increase its size and presence in the industry.
By 2016, Roadrunner had transformed into a major player in the transportation and logistics sector. The company’s acquisitions had propelled its growth, enabling it to become a prominent force in the market. With its expanded network and resources, they had established itself as a significant player, solidifying its position as a leading provider of transportation services.
Acquisition Period
The lack of a strategic plan for Roadrunner’s acquisitions had unintended consequences for the company. As it expanded into the intermodal business and acquired multiple companies, its original focus on less than a truck load service became diluted. This led to a larger organization with numerous divisions and complexities. This shift in focus deviated from its core competencies and had negative implications for its operations.
During this period, they devised an illicit accounting maneuver to manipulate earnout liabilities stemming from their acquisitions. This enabled them to gain access to surplus income, which they utilized to offset future quarters. These deceptive tactics allowed them to manipulate their financial reports and minimize the immediate impact on their net earnings. By deferring expenses in this manner, Roadrunner aimed to present a more favorable financial picture to stakeholders and investors, potentially misleading them about the true financial health of the company.
Impact of Fallout
Roadrunner, in an effort to resolve the allegations of accounting fraud, reached an agreement to compensate a total of $19.5 million. Upon revising their financial statements, it became evident that their reporting earnings were significant inflated, reaching a staggering $66 million. The revelation of this restatement, coupled with the exposure of accounting irregularities, had a profound impact on the value of the company’s stocks. Shareholders who had placed their trust in Roadrunner faced substantial financial setbacks, as the stock price experience a drastic decline of more than 50%.
Peter Armbruster, the CFO, was convicted of engaging in securities fraud as a result of his involvement in the accounting scheme. Consequently, he was sentenced to a two-year imprisonment term and mandated to provide restitution to the shareholders who were adversely affected.
In a bid to put this situation behind them, Roadrunner underwent a change in leadership. By 2020, the company made the decision to divest its truckload business, refocusing its effort on being a standalone less than a truckload carrier. This move proved to be a turning point for Roadrunner, as it successfully regained its financial stability and returned to profitability.
Recommendation
Acquisitions/Growth
I would have suggested that they scale their operations at a pace that aligns with their available resources. Unfortunately, their growth was so rapid that their resources became thinly spread. Additionally, they lacked the opportunity to establish a standardized operating procedure or an effective communication mechanism across various operating channels.
Core Competencies
Their primary expertise revolved around transporting cargo that occupied less than a truckload, specifically catering to metropolitan regions. However, through acquisition, they expanded their services to encompass various modes of cargo. Unfortunately, this diversification led to a dilution of their competitive advantage as their focus shifted towards different customers. To rectify this, they should have catered their acquisition strategy around less than a truckload shipping.
Ethical Accounting Practices
The CFO should have practice ethical accounting principles and ensured that everyone in the organization was held to the same high standard. However, it is the CEO’s responsibility to have the right people on the team and to implement effective checks and balances within the organization.
Discussion Questions
1. What precautionary measure could they have implemented to safeguard themselves from fraudulent activities?
2. What criteria or analytical tool could they have employed to effectively identify prospective companies to acquire?
3. What strategies or approaches could they have employed to handle the aftermath more effectively?
4. How can they regain the trust of their customers and shareholders?
References
Nicodemus, Aaron (2023) “Roadrunner avoids $9.6M in penalties in SEC accounting fraud case”
Compliance Week
https://www.complianceweek.com/regulatory-enforcement/roadrunner-avoids-96m-in-penalties-in-sec-accounting-fraud-case/32679.article
Press Release (2023) “Security Exchange Commission”
https://www.sec.gov/enforce/33-11156-s
Press Release (2023) “Security Exchange Commission”
Press Release (2021) “Department of Transportation”
https://www.oig.dot.gov/library-item/38997
,
This outline is based upon the following sources:
Society for Case Research Guidelines: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tjNJMbl_5DrNaUarqy6Bde4MDhOSSpV3/view?pli=1 Links to an external site.
Sage Business Cases: Information for Authors: https://sk.sagepub.com/cases/author-info Links to an external site.
IMA Educational Case Journal Guidelines: https://www.imanet.org/career-resources/get-published-with-ima/educational-case-journal?psso=true Links to an external site.
Preparing the Case
Before you begin writing, follow these guidelines to help you prepare and understand the case study:
Read and examine the case thoroughly
Take notes, highlight relevant facts, underline key problems.
Focus your analysis
Identify 2-5 key problems. Why do they exist?
How do they impact the organization?
Who is responsible for them?
Uncover possible solutions
Draw from readings, discussions, outside research, your own experience.
Select the best solution
Consider strong supporting evidence. What are the pros and cons? Is this solution realistic?
Case Study Overview (Case + Teaching Note)
The case study should address ethical, regulatory, and social implications in the accounting field. The case should typically include numerical computations (e.g., financial statements) as well as human factors. Typical cases describe a dilemma or decision faced by a well-developed protagonist. Using the Journal of Critical Incidents, the case will introduce critical incidents (not fictional) in the accounting industry and contain a teaching note. Each case should provide only essential historical details and a brief situational context. The case should emphasize a focal point that presents the business problem or situation in an unbiased manner, allowing for varied outcomes or solutions to the case. The case ends with a summary of the overall dilemma or issue being faced and the decision-making role of the student.
Case Study Proposal (3.5-5 pages, single-spaced): Below are the main components of a case study outline:
Title
Introduction
Identify key problems and issues in the case study.
Formulate and include a thesis statement that summarizes the outcome of your analysis in 1–2 sentences.
Context and Background
Set the scene: provide well-researched background information, relevant facts, and important information. (regulations, financial statements, compliance requirements, stakeholders, etc.)
Divide into sections with headings and subheadings.
Learning Outcomes
Provide 3-4 learning outcomes expressed using Bloom’s Taxonomy terms. (Identify, Analyze, Evaluate, Recommend, etc).
See Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Outcomes: https://tips.uark.edu/using-blooms-taxonomy/#:~:text=Bloom's%20Taxonomy%20is%20a%20classification%20of%20the%20different%20outcomes%20and,at%20the%20University%20of%20Chicago Links to an external site..
Discussion Questions
Provide 4 discussion questions for students to answer based on the case.
Discussion questions must include connections to ethics/compliance, regulations, principles, or policy.
References:
Create a preliminary bibliography (use APA 7th) using library and internet sources.
This is your initial search for the case. It should contain at least ten sources. (journal articles, trade journals, periodicals, newspapers, court cases, etc.) At least three journal articles must be included and the journal titles must be one from Cabells: https://www2-cabells-com.jpllnet.sfsu.edu/journalytics Links to an external site..
Style Guidelines (Midterm Case Proposal + Final Case Project)
Use the following style guidelines to complete the midterm case proposal and final case project: Times New Roman font, size 12 point, 1-inch margins and single-spaced.
Synthesize all the sources throughout your paper. Paraphrasing is most often used to blend the ideas of another writer’s text with the prose style of our own work. Do not use bullet points for the case proposal and final case project, and make sure to write in complete sentences. Turnitin and AI Generative Tools on the syllabus will be applied.
The Midterm Case Proposal must be a minimum of 3.5 pages with single spacing. The Final Case Project must be a minimum of 7.5 pages with single spacing Paragraphs are usually about 150-200 words long.
The Midterm Case Proposal and the Final Case Project must be provided in Microsoft Word. Do not submit your paper in Google Docs, PDF, or PAGES.
Write in the third person, in the past tense, and establish an obj