For this assignment, you will identify credible resources aligning with four critical sections of the course project. You will list your resources in a referen

3/5/24, 8:56 AM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1504815/viewContent/29866812/View 1/2

IHP 630 Module Two Project Preparation Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

This course requires you to submit the course project in Module Nine. However, you’ll complete multiple preparation assignments along the way to guide you to a successful submission of the

project.

For this assignment, you will identify credible resources aligning with four critical sections of the course project. You will list your resources in a reference document using APA format and

brie�y describe how each resource is appropriate for the project. Your submission does not need to be structured like an annotated bibliography, but it should have enough resources to help

you get started with the course project. The preparation work you will submit through this assignment will help you complete the course project on time.

Directions

Create a reference document that lists the resources for the course project. Refer to the “Getting Started with Research at Shapiro Library" section of the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—

Graduate, located in the Start Here section of the course, to help you complete this assignment.

If you need writing support, access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.

Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Content: Identify at least two resources for each of the four critical sections in the course project: Strategic Planning, Healthcare Reimbursement, Revenue Cycle Process, and

Reimbursement Compliance. Do not include any resources provided in any of the Module Resources sections throughout the course.

2. Relevance: Describe the relevance of the resources you identi�ed in a short paragraph, using two to three sentences for each resource. Consider the following questions to guide your

response:

How is the resource aligned with the relevant section in the course project?

How will the resource inform your writing, as well as be considered as evidence to support each of the four critical sections?

3. Credibility: Explain why the sources you identi�ed are credible, scholarly and/or professional resources and the importance of including credible sources as evidence to support your

claims. Consider the following questions to guide your response:

Has the resource been peer reviewed or taken from a reputed source such as a government website?

Is the information up to date (published within the last �ve years)?

4. Gap Assessment: Identify gaps in your research and determine how to close these gaps. Consider the following questions to guide your response:

Have you identi�ed the areas in the project where you need to do further research and add resources?

What additional research will you conduct to close your knowledge gaps (for example, interviewing leadership in your organization, Google Scholar search, etc.)?



3/5/24, 8:56 AM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1504815/viewContent/29866812/View 2/2

All the claims in your deliverable should be evidence based. Your citations should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the scenario, textbook, or module resources) of

credible sources and be current within the last �ve years. You are required to cite a minimum of two sources, at least one of which should be separate from your own research.

What to Submit

Submit your reference document as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Also include a title page. Sources

should be cited according to APA style.

Module Two Project Preparation Rubric

Criteria Pro�cient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Content Identi�es at least two resources for each of

the four critical sections in the course

project: Strategic Planning, Healthcare

Reimbursement, Revenue Cycle Process,

and Reimbursement Compliance

Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but

with errors or omissions

Does not attempt criterion 20

Relevance Describes the relevance of each resource

in a short paragraph (two to three

sentences)

Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but

with errors or omissions

Does not attempt criterion 30

Credibility Explains why the sources identi�ed are

credible, scholarly and/or professional

resources and the importance of including

credible sources as evidence to support

claims

Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but

with errors or omissions

Does not attempt criterion 20

Gap Assessment Identi�es gaps in research and determines

how to close these

Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but

with errors or omissions

Does not attempt criterion 10

Articulation of Response Clearly conveys meaning with correct

grammar, sentence structure, and spelling,

demonstrating an understanding of

audience and purpose

Shows progress toward pro�ciency, but

with errors in grammar, sentence structure,

and spelling, negatively impacting

readability

Submission has critical errors in grammar,

sentence structure, and spelling,

preventing understanding of ideas

10

APA Style Formats in-text citations and reference list

according to APA style with fewer than �ve

errors

Formats in-text citations and reference list

according to APA style with �ve or more

errors

Does not format in-text citations and

reference list according to APA style

10

Total: 100%