Include the following as part of your outline:
- The reason or purpose of the presentation (e.g., a problem, challenge, or learning opportunity that needs to be addressed), along with the setting and audience.
- Explain how 2-3 brain-based learning principles will be incorporated, and why they are appropriate for the intended audience (e.g., multi-sensory learning, spaced repetition, memory consolidation, real-world relevance).
- A minimum of two strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience, such as human attention, memory, and motivation. Justify how the strategies are appropriate for your setting and audience.
- The anticipated changes or desired outcomes of your presentation.
- At least one potential challenge of learning that may be encountered within the chosen professional setting, including suggested methods to overcome the challenge using a brain-based principle and/or strategy.
- At least two additional resources that support the intended learning, or that can be shared with the audience for future reference. Your resources are going to be things that they can look at to gain more info. This can be video links, blogs, books, etc. They may or may not be a part of your references.
Support your work with 2-3 scholarly resources.
Brain-Based Learning in Action – Rubric
Purpose, Setting, Audience 13 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 13 points
Thoroughly describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the
presentation.
4. Acceptable 11.31 points
Aptly describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the presentation.
3. Approaching 9.62 points
Adequately describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the
presentation.
2. Insufficient 8.97 points
Inadequately describes the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the
presentation.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Description of the reason or purpose, setting, and audience of the presentation is
incomplete or not included.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Brain-Based Learning 19.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 19.5 points
Proficiently explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated
and why they are appropriate for the audience.
4. Acceptable 16.97 points
Effectively explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated
and why they are appropriate for the audience.
3. Approaching 14.43 points
Partially explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated
and why they are appropriate for the audience.
2. Insufficient 13.45 points
Insufficiently explains 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be
incorporated and why they are appropriate for the audience.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Fails to identify 2-3 principles of brain-based learning that will be incorporated and
why they are appropriate for the audience.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Strategy 19.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 19.5 points
Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience
are ideal and expertly justified for the setting and audience.
4. Acceptable 16.97 points
Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience
are logical and soundly justified for the setting and audience.
3. Approaching 14.43 points
Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience
are lacking detail and/or minimally justified for the setting and audience.
2. Insufficient 13.45 points
Strategies for learning that are designed based on concepts related to neuroscience
are ambiguous and/or inadequately justified for the setting and audience.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Strategies for learning are not designed based on concepts related to neuroscience
and/or there is no justification.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.