May I please get this ran through a plagiarism tool as my professor is saying that it is plagiarised? Please help me.
According to “Age of Reason,” the intellectual and philosophical movement known as the “Age of Reason”, or “Age of Enlightenment” ruled Europe’s world of ideas from the 17th century to the 19th century. The sovereignty of reason and the evidence of the senses as the primary sources of knowledge were at the center of a variety of ideas currently. In addition, the inclusion of advanced ideals like liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government, and the separation of church and state was done so. We can see that the colonial period and the Reason/Rationalism/Neoclassicism/Enlightenment/Revolution periods were very different but similar times by comparing Phillis Wheatley and Anne Bradstreet’s upbringings, writings, and motives.
To begin, who are Phillis Wheatley and Anne Bradstreet? Phillis Wheatley was a poet who lived in the Reason, Neoclassicism, Neo Rationalism, Enlightenment, and Revolution from 1753 to 1784. According to the Poetry Foundation’s article about Phillis Wheatley, she was “the best poet of the period” and wrote a lot of great poems in her lifetime. She was sold into slavery when she was seven years old, and she was born in Africa. She went to live with a wealthy family in North America, where they taught her to read and write. She received a solid education in the Bible, astronomy, geography, history, British literature, and the Greek and Latin classics written by Virgil, Ovid, Terence, and Homer shortly thereafter. In contrast, Anne Bradstreet was the first woman to be recognized as an accomplished New World poet during the colonial era. She lived from 1612 to 1672. According to the Poetry Foundation’s article about Anne Bradstreet, although she did not have a formal education, her father did instruct her. Anne Bradstreet was born into an aristocratic family. She got married to Simon Bradstreet, who was also governor of Massachusetts and the father of eight children.
Even though both women were great writers, their works have a lot in common and a lot in common with one another. Both women wrote a wide range of works and used poetry to record significant events. Even though both documented significant events, Phillis Wheatley had a more public voice, whereas Anne Bradstreet preferred her work to be more personal and used a private voice. However, because they occurred at different times, the events they documented were distinct from one another. According to the study hall noticed, Phillis Wheatley’s topic goes from sincere Christianity, puritan convictions/impacts, interest in profound opportunity rather than independence from subjugation, the festivity of her otherworldly salvation, articulation of despondency, nationalism, and faithfulness to American Freedom, neo-old-style topics and styles, profound life-and-passing matters, and, ultimately, interest in recent developments and verse that tended to unmistakable individuals.
In contrast, according to the notes, Anne Bradstreet frequently wrote about topics such as “her spiritual temptations, self-denigration, her musings and walks along the Merrimack River, the importance of family, and her affection for her husband and her children.” She frequently explored these themes in her writing. Her writings primarily reflected the religious and emotional conflicts she encountered as a woman writer and puritan. Another important way to compare the writing motivations of Phillis Wheatley and Anne Bradstreet is to compare them. Phillis Wheatley was a vocal supporter of the struggle for American independence and wrote several poems in his honor. According to the Poetry Foundation’s article on Phillis Wheatley, many of her poems reflect a variety of people who influenced her life. She studied and admired Thomas Gray and Alexander Pope, two people who influenced her. She was also incredibly proud of her African heritage.
Anne Bradstreet: Despite this, she devoted her life to the religious concept of salvation because she valued life on earth. According to the Poetry Foundation’s article about Anne Bradstreet, “her hope for heaven was an expression of her desire to live forever rather than a wish to transcend worldly concerns.” She wrote to “voice her opinion on matters such as how women were looked down upon in colonial times” and to demonstrate her love, faithfulness, and devotion to her husband, as is abundantly clear. In her poem “The Prologue,” for instance, she makes the point that women are not as good as men by using a sarcastic tone.
By studying Phillis Wheatley, a writer during the Age of Reason, and Anne Bradstreet, a writer during the colonial period, we can generally observe the similarities and differences that exist between the colonial period and the Reason/Rationalism/Neoclassicism/Enlightenment/Revolution period. Without this period of progress in ideals like liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government, and the separation of church and state, there would not have been many literary advancements. Without the works that were written during the Age of Reason, also known as the Age of Enlightenment, literature would not be where it is today.
