Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Evaluate the strengths of submissions - Writeden

This course contains two peer review assignments that take place within the discussion forums. The purpose of the peer reviews in this course is to help your classmates improve their work while strengthening your own editing and critical-thinking abilities by providing constructive, criteria-based reviews of others’ work. As you review your peers’ work, it is extremely important that you review and refer to the rubric for the assignment you are reviewing. Your instructor will use this rubric to grade the assignment when it is submitted.

You’ve completed much of your work on your final project. However, you still need to make specific recommendations to help your selected company carry out the new CSR and ESG policies.

Please complete a daft of 2-3 pages, with APA citations, for your recommendations. Include a limit of 5-7 scholarly resources and ensure all points are defensible with research.

Directions

Post a draft of the assignment for peer review as your initial post.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Evaluation of Strengths: Evaluate the strengths of submissions, using the assignment rubric to justify your response.

2. Opportunities for Improvement: Identify areas in the submissions that are opportunities for improvement, using information from the assignment rubric to justify your response.

3. Concrete Suggestions: Provide company-specific, concrete suggestions for the identified opportunities to improve with appropriate focus and tone.