Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Follow rubric verbatim? What to Submit Submit your analysis report as a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Also - Writeden

Follow rubric verbatim 

What to Submit

Submit your analysis report as a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Also include a title page. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

4/1/24, 6:31 PM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1504815/viewContent/29866817/View 1/3

IHP 630 Module Six Project Preparation Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

In this module, you learned about the internal and external revenue-cycle work�ows, and how these are impacted by insurance plan requirements and regulations. You also read about the

operational work�ows within a healthcare revenue cycle.

This assignment will allow you to assess the impact of internal and external revenue-cycle work�ows on strategic planning and �nancial management and identify front-end, middle, and back-

end revenue-cycle processes within operational work�ows.

The assignment will help you prepare for sections 4 (Healthcare Reimbursement), 5 (Revenue-Cycle Process), and 6C (Technology and System Impacts) in the course project.

Directions

Create an analysis report to assess an organization’s internal work�ows from the context of improving cash �ow and �nancial strength. If you need writing support, access the Online Writing

Center through the Academic Support module of your course.

Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Patient Registration: Analyze the signi�cance of the steps in the operational work�ow for registering a patient prior to a diagnostic procedure. Consider the following questions to guide

your response:

What is the signi�cance of the patient �nancial responsibility agreement?

When should the provider present an advance bene�ciary noti�cation of noncoverage to the bene�ciary?

2. Errors Impacting Cash Flow: Analyze the revenue-cycle errors that may occur in internal and external work�ows that can impact a healthcare organization’s cash �ow and �nancial

strength. Consider the following questions to guide your response:

What errors can occur that will impact revenue integrity?

How do these errors affect the organization’s cash �ow?

3. Prevention of Errors: Explain how the errors you described can be prevented. Consider the following questions to guide your response:

What changes in the process will help prevent these errors?

What tools or systems can you use to prevent these errors?

4. Work�ow Improvements: Recommend at least two work�ow process improvements across the front-end, middle, and back-end revenue-cycle processes. These work�ow improvements

must not be directly related to the error-prevention recommendations you provided. Consider the following questions to guide your response:

What improvements can you recommend for internal processes?



4/1/24, 6:31 PM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1504815/viewContent/29866817/View 2/3

What improvements can you recommend for external processes?

All the claims in your deliverable should be evidence based. Your citations should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the textbook or module resources) of credible

sources and be current within the last �ve years. You are required to cite a minimum of two sources, at least one of which should be separate from your own research. Refer to the IHP 630

Library Guide located in the Start Here section of the course for additional support.

What to Submit

Submit your analysis report as a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Also include a title page. Sources should

be cited according to APA style.

Module Six Project Preparation Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Patient Registration Exceeds pro�ciency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-speci�c language

Analyzes the signi�cance of the

steps for registering a patient

prior to a diagnostic procedure

Shows progress toward

pro�ciency, but with errors or

omissions

Does not attempt criterion 20

Errors Impacting Cash Flow Exceeds pro�ciency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-speci�c language

Analyzes the revenue cycle

errors that may occur in

internal and external

work�ows that can impact a

healthcare organization’s cash

�ow and �nancial strength

Shows progress toward

pro�ciency, but with errors or

omissions

Does not attempt criterion 20

Prevention of Errors Exceeds pro�ciency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-speci�c language

Explains how the described

errors can be prevented

Shows progress toward

pro�ciency, but with errors or

omissions

Does not attempt criterion 20

Work�ow Improvements Exceeds pro�ciency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-speci�c language

Recommends at least two

work�ow process

improvements

Shows progress toward

pro�ciency, but with errors or

omissions

Does not attempt criterion 15

4/1/24, 6:31 PM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1504815/viewContent/29866817/View 3/3

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner

Clearly conveys meaning with

correct grammar, sentence

structure, and spelling,

demonstrating an

understanding of audience and

purpose

Shows progress toward

pro�ciency, but with errors in

grammar, sentence structure,

and spelling, negatively

impacting readability

Submission has critical errors in

grammar, sentence structure,

and spelling, preventing

understanding of ideas

10

Scholarly and Professional

Sources

Incorporates more than two

scholarly, current (within the

last �ve years) sources, or use

of sources is exceptionally

insightful

Incorporates two scholarly,

current (within the last �ve

years) sources that support

claims

Incorporates fewer than two

scholarly, current (within the

last �ve years) sources, or not

all sources support claims

Does not incorporate sources 10

APA Style Formats in-text citations and

reference list according to APA

style with no errors

Formats in-text citations and

reference list according to APA

style with fewer than �ve

errors

Formats in-text citations and

reference list according to APA

style with �ve or more errors

Does not format in-text

citations and reference list

according to APA style

5

Total: 100%