Consider the application of Kantian universal principles in the context of the Apple/Foxconn scenario described in Chapter 6. How might cultural differences impact the interpretation and practice of Respect for Persons in a global business setting? Would you agree with the claim that Apple and Foxconn are operating both legally and morally? What relevant details of the scenario support your conclusion?
Part II respond to classmate:
Cultural difference can impact a work environment because in the varying of cultures, morals, principles, and logics varies as well. What’s ethical for one cultures and accepted in one environment might not be accepted or considered ethical in the next environment.
The question of whether or not Apple and FoxConn are operating morally is a question of what particular aspect of morality are we assessing. If we’re assessing whether they operate morally from a business and confidential perspective then yes, if I agree with all of there stances, no.
Only one part necessary and no citations or sources.