Chat with us, powered by LiveChat In this writing assignment, you will use the same case you chose for the Week 3 assignment to demonstrate an understanding of competitive analysis and innovati - Writeden

 week 3 assignment is at the bottom of the instructions

Overview

In this writing assignment, you will use the same case you chose for the Week 3 assignment to demonstrate an understanding of competitive analysis and innovation. By identifying your chosen company's strengths and weaknesses relative to its competitors, you will be able to craft recommendations to the CEO and upper-level management on how the company can use innovation in the industry to gain a competitive advantage.

Instructions

Write a 3-5 page paper in which you:

  1. Analyze how your chosen company competes within its industry.
    • Analyze the competitive environment within your chosen company's industry (companies in the same line of business).
    • Evaluate how competitors position themselves within the industry; evaluate how your company is working to reposition itself within the industry against the competitors.
  2. Examine at least two innovative technology trends that the company or its competitors introduced.
    • Comment on the feasibility and expected market impact of those trends.
  3. Assess your company's capabilities, resources, and structure to measure its current ability to succeed as an innovator and competitor. Include the following in your response:
    • Identify which capabilities and resources are strategically most important within the industry.
    • Assess the company's situation (for example, its capabilities, resources, and so on) regarding its recent development.
    • Identify, examine, and assess your chosen company's internal environment (strengths and weaknesses).
    • Examine how those strengths and weaknesses can guide the company through its external environment (opportunities and threats) to compete better and bring an above-average return.
  4. Determine whether your company's organizational structure supports or impedes its ability to innovate and succeed competitively.
    • Provide support and justification for your response.
  5. Use at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.

For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

  • Conduct a competitive analysis of technology trends, company resources and capabilities, and organizational structure for future innovation in a given industry.

View RubricWeek 5 Assignment – Innovation and Competitive AnalysisWeek 5 Assignment – Innovation and Competitive AnalysisCriteriaRatingsPtsAnalyze how your chosen company competes within its industry.28 to >25.2 ptsExemplaryAnalyzed how your chosen company competes within its industry.25.2 to >22.4 ptsCompetentAnalyzed how your chosen company competes within its industry, but the analysis was incomplete.22.4 to >19.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementAnalyzed how your chosen company competes within its industry, but the analysis was incorrect.19.6 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not analyze how your chosen company competes within its industry./ 28 ptsExamine at least two innovative technology trends that the company or its competitors introduced.28 to >25.2 ptsExemplaryExamined at least two innovative technology trends that the company or its competitors introduced.25.2 to >22.4 ptsCompetentExamined two innovative technology trends that the company or its competitors introduced, but the examination was incomplete.22.4 to >19.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementExamined one innovative technology trends that the company or its competitors introduced.19.6 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not examine at least two innovative technology trends that the company or its competitors introduced./ 28 ptsAssess your company’s capabilities, resources, and structure to measure its current ability to succeed as an innovator and competitor.35 to >31.5 ptsExemplaryAssessed your company’s capabilities, resources, and structure to measure its current ability to succeed as an innovator and competitor.31.5 to >28 ptsCompetentAssessed your company’s capabilities, resources, and structure to measure its current ability to succeed as an innovator and competitor, but the assessment was incomplete.28 to >24.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementAssessed your company’s capabilities, resources, and structure to measure its current ability to succeed as an innovator and competitor, but the assessment was incorrect.24.5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not assess your company’s capabilities, resources, and structure to measure its current ability to succeed as an innovator and competitor./ 35 ptsDetermine whether your company’s organizational structure supports or impedes its ability to innovate and succeed competitively.28 to >25.2 ptsExemplaryDetermined whether your company’s organizational structure supports or impedes its ability to innovate and succeed competitively.25.2 to >22.4 ptsCompetentDetermined whether your company’s organizational structure supports or impedes its ability to innovate and succeed competitively, but the determination was incomplete.22.4 to >19.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementDetermined whether your company’s organizational structure supports or impedes its ability to innovate and succeed competitively, but the determination was incorrect.19.6 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not determine whether your company’s organizational structure supports or impedes its ability to innovate and succeed competitively./ 28 ptsProvide at least three quality references.7 to >6.3 ptsExemplaryProvided quality resources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate.6.3 to >5.6 ptsCompetentProvided quality resources that are credible, relevant, or appropriate, but not all three.5.6 to >4.9 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvided references, but they are not credible, relevant, or appropriate.4.9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableNo references provided./ 7 ptsClarity, writing mechanics, and SWS formatting requirements.14 to >12.6 ptsExemplaryWriting has very few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 0–2 errors present.12.6 to >11.2 ptsCompetentWriting has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in a few places; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 3–4 errors present.11.2 to >9.8 ptsNeeds ImprovementWriting has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in some places. 5–6 errors present.9.8 to >0 ptsUnacceptableWriting has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, including fragments, comma splices, and run-ons, that distract from the message. More than 6 errors present/ 14 pts
 

7

Business Finance

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name

Professor’s Name

Date

Strategy Development Analysis: Google's Transformation to Alphabet

Current Business Strategy and Development

Google's transformation into Alphabet represents a fundamental shift in business strategy, moving from a single-focused search engine company to a diversified technology conglomerate. The company's current strategy revolves around maintaining its dominant position in digital advertising while simultaneously pursuing innovative technological ventures across multiple sectors. This dual-focused approach allows the company to generate stable revenue from its core business while investing in future growth opportunities (Georgios, 1).

The primary strategic differentiator for the company lies in its organizational structure. By creating Alphabet as a holding company, the organization separated its mature, profitable core business (Google) from its more experimental ventures. This structure provides greater transparency and operational autonomy to different business units while maintaining strategic oversight at the holding company level (Hyungkee., 2)

The company's approach to addressing its organizational challenges focuses on balancing innovation with stability. Through the Alphabet structure, the company can maintain the entrepreneurial spirit necessary for breakthrough innovations while providing the accountability and transparency expected by stakeholders (Hyungkee., 2) This strategy also allows for more focused management attention on specific business areas, with each subsidiary having its own leadership team and strategic objectives.

Evaluation of Competitors' Strategies

In the technology sector, several major competitors employ different strategies to address similar business challenges:

Facebook (Meta) has adopted a strategy of focused diversification, concentrating primarily on social media platforms and virtual reality technology. Their approach involves acquiring potential competitors and investing heavily in the metaverse concept (Mehmet, 2). While this strategy has allowed them to maintain dominance in social media, their heavy investment in virtual reality has yet to show significant returns.

Amazon has pursued a strategy of related diversification, expanding from e-commerce into cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and entertainment. Their approach of leveraging core competencies while entering new markets has proven highly successful, particularly with Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Microsoft has employed a hybrid strategy, maintaining its traditional software business while aggressively expanding into cloud computing and artificial intelligence. Their success in enterprise services and cloud infrastructure demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach.

While these competitor strategies have shown varying degrees of success, Alphabet's unique holding company structure provides distinct advantages (Mehmet, 3). The company could potentially adopt elements of these competitors' strategies, but its current approach allows for greater flexibility and risk management in pursuing diverse technological innovations.

Strategy Formulation Based on Industry Trends and Organizational Characteristics

Given the current industry trends and Alphabet's organizational characteristics, several strategic recommendations emerge:

1. Enhanced Integration of AI Capabilities The company should further integrate artificial intelligence across all its subsidiaries. This strategy leverages Alphabet's extensive data resources and technical expertise while addressing the increasing importance of AI in various industries. The company's organizational structure allows for both centralized AI research and decentralized application across different business units (Georgios, 1).

2. Sustainable Technology Focus Developing and implementing sustainable technology solutions across all business units would align with global environmental trends while creating new market opportunities (Mehmet, 3). This could include green data centers, renewable energy projects, and environmental monitoring systems.

3. Healthcare Technology Expansion Given the company's strong capabilities in data analytics and AI, expanding its healthcare technology initiatives could provide significant growth opportunities (Hyungkee., 2) The separate subsidiary structure under Alphabet is particularly well-suited for managing healthcare-related regulatory requirements and privacy concerns.

Implementation and Success Measurement

The implementation of these strategic recommendations should follow a structured approach:

Implementation Steps:

1. Establish cross-subsidiary AI implementation teams to identify integration opportunities

2. Create sustainability metrics and goals for each subsidiary

3. Develop partnerships with healthcare providers and research institutions

4. Allocate research and development resources based on strategic priorities

5. Set up regular progress review mechanisms at both subsidiary and holding company levels

Success Measurement Framework:

1. Quantitative Metrics:

i. Revenue growth from new AI implementations

ii. Cost savings from sustainable technology adoption

iii. Market share in healthcare technology segments

iv. Return on investment for new initiatives

v. Patent applications in strategic areas

2. Qualitative Metrics:

i. Brand perception in new markets

ii. Employee satisfaction and retention

iii. Innovation ecosystem development

iv. Strategic partnership effectiveness

v. Regulatory compliance and relationships

3. Timeline-based Evaluation:

i. Quarterly progress reviews at subsidiary level

ii. Semi-annual strategic alignment assessments

iii. Annual comprehensive strategy evaluation

iv. Three-year major strategic review

The success of these recommendations should be monitored through a balanced scorecard approach, considering both financial and non-financial indicators (Georgios, 1). Regular assessment of these metrics will allow for strategy adjustment and optimization as market conditions evolve.

Conclusion

Alphabet's unique organizational structure provides a strong foundation for implementing these strategic recommendations. The company's ability to maintain focus on core business operations while pursuing innovative ventures positions it well for future growth. By carefully implementing these strategies and monitoring their success through comprehensive metrics, Alphabet can continue to lead technological advancement while maintaining sustainable business growth.

References

1. Georgios Chalkidis. 2019. Alphabet Inc-Internet/Advertising pp. 1-76 https://www.proquest.com/openview/62440693e8689ce57d0bfd8ae145372e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y

2. Hyungkee Kim. 2020. The analysis of innovation management in Google p. 10 https://doi.org/10.30560/jems.v3n4p10

3. Mehmet Cagri Becerir. 2020. Setting the Record Straight: A Comparative Analysis of Google's Organizational Identity Communication Versus the Media's Portrayal pp. 1-94 https://www.proquest.com/openview/1b52d4c1d201b12267b61d7b42ec94e1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y