Need assistance with a rough draft.
Only need intro paragraph, first body paragraph, and works cited.
500 words, 1 page
Please see attachments
In Week 6 after you review your feedback on your outline, you will start the First Draft of your Research Paper (500 words). This should be typed in Times New Roman, 12-font, single spaced, approx.. 1 page. In this assignment, you will write your introductory paragraph and your first body paragraph with your Works Cited page. You will use last week’s outline for help. This first draft will help you practice turning an outline into a paper and shed light on any holes you will need to patch before finishing your whole paper.
|
10 |
15 |
20 |
|
|
Content (50%) |
Content is average. Student addresses some assignment criteria in content, but not all. Critical thinking is underdeveloped or undistinguished. |
Content is above average. Student addresses all assignment criteria, though quality and depth may not be as high as that reflected in superior papers. |
Content is superior. Student fully addresses assignment criteria and demonstrates effective critical thinking. |
|
Writing Style (30%) |
Style is average, with frequent stylistic errors. Tone/diction may be unprofessional or inappropriate at times. |
Style is above average. Only minor or infrequent stylistic errors exist. Tone/diction are appropriate and professional. |
Style is superior. Writing contains no awkward passages or sentence errors and flows smoothly. Student exhibits mastery of tone/diction. |
|
Grammar/Mechanics/Punctuation (10%) |
Average. Frequent errors in grammar/mechanics/punctuation are present. |
Above average. Few errors in grammar/mechanics/punctuation are present. |
Superior. Student exhibits mastery of grammar/mechanics/punctuation; errors, if they exist, are minor and very infrequent. |
|
Follows Instructions (10%) |
Average. Student submits paper that does not address one instruction. |
Above average. Student submits paper that addresses assignment instructions, but one instruction is not addressed completely. |
Superior. Student submits paper that meets or exceeds assignment instructions. |
,
HandfordOutline by Kimberley Handford
Submission date: 30-Apr-2023 09:16PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 2080282747 File name: 130602_Kimberley_Handford_HandfordOutline_6035521_977392310.docx (14.86K) Word count: 683 Character count: 4380
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Possessive
Possessive
1
2
3
8
8% SIMILARITY INDEX
3% INTERNET SOURCES
6% PUBLICATIONS
8% STUDENT PAPERS
1 3%
2 2%
3 2%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
HandfordOutline ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Georgetown University Student Paper
Submitted to Leiden University Student Paper
Submitted to CSU, Long Beach Student Paper
FINAL GRADE
84/100
HandfordOutline GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Kimberley, thank you for submitting the Week 5 Ou tline. You included the required elements, includin g the use of four sources. Please review my comme nt markups within your document for information t o apply as you work on your rough draft essay. If y ou have any questions, feel free to email me. Than ks for your work on this! Professor Gonzalez
PAGE 1
Comment 1
You have some good information here, but remember that a thesis should be one very speci fic sentence in length. See if you can work on paring this down and condensing your argume nt into one sentence. It can be a lengthier sentence (just make sure you use punctuation app ropriately to avoid a run-on).
Comment 2
This sentence isn't entirely clear, mainly because you used "globalization" at the beginning a nd end of the sentence. It's as though you're trying to explain globalization by using the term globalization, which doesn't work. Please work on re-framing this idea so that it's a clearer, m ore specific claim that directly connects to your thesis argument.
Comment 3
Instead of referring to authors in the wrap-up areas, phrase these components in your own words (using your own ideas).
PAGE 2
Comment 4
This is basically a repeat of the above topic sentence. Some variation and/or greater explana tion would have been ideal here. Remember that the example sections could have been mor e detailed than just a source excerpt.
Comment 5
See my previous comments about the construction of the wrap-up sentences.
Comment 6
I recommend that you work on making this a more specific claim that directly ties to your the sis argument.
PAGE 3
Comment 7
This is a bit vague as well. I think that once you have refined your thesis argument it will be e asier for you to create more tightly focused, specific topic sentences. You will then want to en sure that all body content (within your research paper) is written to support your thesis argu ment.
Possessive Review the rules for possessive nouns.
Possessive Review the rules for possessive nouns.
PAGE 4
Comment 8
Since we are working remotely, please make sure you include a link for each resource. Here i s a helpful link pertaining to MLA citation development:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guid e/mla_works_cited_page_basic_format.html
RUBRIC: ENG101 OUTLINE RUBRIC
CRITERION 1
SCALE 1 (5)
SCALE 2 (4)
SCALE 3 (3)
SCALE 4 (2)
SCALE 5 (1)
CRITERION 2
SCALE 1 (5)
SCALE 2 (4)
SCALE 3 (3)
SCALE 4 (2)
SCALE 5 (1)
CRITERION 3
SCALE 1 (5)
SCALE 2 (4)
SCALE 3 (3)
SCALE 4 (2)
21 / 25
4 / 5
Thesis
0 mistakes
1 mistake
2 mistakes
3 mistakes
4 mistakes
4 / 5
Topic sentences
0 mistakes
1 mistake
2 mistakes
3 mistakes
4 mistakes
4 / 5
Examples
0 mistakes
1 mistake
2 mistakes
3 mistakes
SCALE 5 (1)
CRITERION 4
SCALE 1 (5)
SCALE 2 (4)
SCALE 3 (3)
SCALE 4 (2)
SCALE 5 (1)
CRITERION 5
SCALE 1 (5)
SCALE 2 (4)
SCALE 3 (3)
SCALE 4 (2)
SCALE 5 (1)
4 mistakes
5 / 5
Wrap-up sentences
0 mistakes
1 mistake
2 mistakes
3 mistakes
4 mistakes
4 / 5
Works Cited
0 mistakes
1 mistake
2 mistakes
3 mistakes
4 mistakes