Hello,
Please assist with the assignment below, Than you.
Literature Review Assignment
Topic: The local emergency management organization need to collaborate with other EM stakeholders to enhance disaster response.
Writ a minimum of 12 pags long Literature Review about the article below. Using the following steps. Start with Introduction then Outline of Chapter and headings to come, and Explanation of where you found sources.
Literature review steps.
Start with Introduction, Outline, headings to come and sources.
(Focus of Current Research)
Discuss what terms did you use to search articles, which databases did you use
Discuss what is known about your topic/problem statement.
(Risk, Perception and Vulnerabilities)
Organize by idea, discussing them separately. Name each section based on the topic.
Define key terms under each section.
Provide and discuss the Guiding Theoretical Model that your study will use.
(Differences and Recommendations)
Summary
Provide a summary of what was included in the literature review
Stress the gap in the literature and explain how your study fills that gap.
LITERATURE REVIEW ARTICLE
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTYc7h_JRr5VRiGqqx20M0adbxHRxQBiL1LmsI74IT1F9MeEKE5f2y_gEjWYmZzaWvxgKsbfzt_Jf2K/pub
Kreps and Bosworth (1986) and Dynes and Quarantelli (1968) discuss the importance of communication in disaster management and risk assessment. Kreps and Bosworth (1986) propose that risk communication should focus on informing people of their rights and responsibilities in the event of a disaster, as well as providing accurate information about the risks associated with the event.
On the other hand, Dynes and Quarantelli (1968) highlight the need for effective communication with both the public and first responders in order to ensure a successful response to a disaster. Rollason et al. (2017) and Salman and Li (2018) discuss strategies for effective risk communication during a public emergency. Rollason et al. (2017) suggest that risk communication should be tailored to the needs of the target audience, and that messages should be simple, clear, and concise. Salman and Li (2018) provide an overview of different strategies for risk communication, such as using visual aids, creating a sense of urgency, and providing clear instructions.
Finally, Abrams and Greenhawt (2020) and Glik (2007) examine the role of risk communication in public emergencies. Abrams and Greenhawt (2020) suggest that risk to be communicated throughout the duration of the emergency, and that messages should be tailored to the specific needs of the target audience. Glik (2007) emphasizes the importance of using language that is understandable to the public, and suggests that messages should be designed to reduce panic and promote positive behaviors.
Explaining and defining recommendations, Risk and communication challenges:
? Risk communication is a key component of emergency management and response, yet it can be a challenge for both the public and emergency management organizations. Eisenman et al. (2007) discuss the challenges faced by the public when it comes to understanding and responding to information about risks during a disaster. The authors suggest that individuals tend to focus on the immediate risks, rather than the long-term ones, and that they may be overwhelmed by the amount of information provided. Additionally, the public may not understand the risks, or may not be motivated to respond appropriately in the face of the risks. Arlikatti et al. (2006) focus on the risk and communication challenges faced by emergency management organizations. The authors note that emergency managers often struggle to communicate risks accurately and effectively, as they may not have the necessary expertise or resources. Additionally, they may not be able to predict how the public will respond to risk information, or may not understand the cultural context in which they are communicating. Finally, Sutton et al. (2008) discuss the challenges of coordinating a collaborative response to disaster management. The authors suggest that this can be a difficult task due to the complexity of the process, the differences between agencies and stakeholders, and the need for efficient communication and coordination.
The paper also explores the important things that leaders should do to ensure that members feel valued and appreciated when working in a group. The paper’s contributions to practice, policy, and the discipline of emergency management and homeland security are significant. The paper’s insights and recommendations can be used to enhance collaboration efforts, improve response efforts, and develop policies and guidelines for emergency management collaboration.
References:
Lindell, M. K., Perry, R. W., Prater, C., & Nicholson, W. C. (2006). Myths and realities of household disaster response. Fundamentals of emergency management (pp. 221-243). Washington, DC: FEMA.
Dae-W. L. (2020)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212420919309331#:~:text=Collaborative%20disaster%20management%20based%20on,more%20effective%20rapid%20disaster%20response.
Noran, O. (2014). Collaborative Disaster Management: An Interdisciplinary Approach.
https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/62150/95057_1.pdf;sequence=1
Naim K. and Vener G. (2011) Collaborative Decision-Making in Emergency and Disaster Management.
Valerie D. (2007) Developing disaster management modules: a collaborative approach.
F.N. Abdeen, T. Fernando, U. Kulatunga, S. Hettige, K.D. Arjuna Ranasinghe (2021, Article 102389) Challenges in multi-agency collaboration in disaster management: A Sri Lankan perspective. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420921003605
