n a minimum of two pages:
- List two or three constructs of interest that you may consider exploring in your dissertation study.
- Define the constructs.
- Discuss how you could measure the constructs, along with the advantages and limitations of each type of measurement. Note that you should not identify any specific assessment instruments for this assignment. Rather, you should address different methods of assessing these constructs, such as self-report, observation, or clinical interview, for example.
Key Concepts in Psychological Testing Discussion
Student name
Instructor
Course code/name
Date
Key Concepts in Psychological Testing Discussion
Kline (2005) introduces fundamental statistics knowledge for psychological testing through his book Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation. The core concepts taught in Chapter 1 encompass measurement scales and their properties, along with null hypothesis testing and correlation, which serve as fundamental principles for psychological testing evaluation.
Scales of Measurement
Kline (2005) established four measurement levels, from nominal to ordinal to interval to ratio scales. The classification method of nominal scales presents data through categories that maintain no specific sequence, like gender categories or political groups. The ordinal measurement method allows the ranking of students based on performance yet fails to provide quantitative distinctions between their positions. The temperature measurement scale in Celsius works with equal value spacing yet fails to establish a starting point as zero. Ratio scales contain absolute zero reference points that allow quantitative proportion comparisons between weight and height measurements (in the case of 50 kg weight, when compared to 100 kg weight, the smaller value is exactly one-half). The selected measurement scale shapes which statistical methods can analyze research data (Kline, 2005).
Statistical Significance and the Null Hypothesis
Standard statistical assessments determine whether detected changes in data sets stem from accidental occurrences. According to Kline (2005), the null hypothesis (H₀) works as the default assumption for non-existence, while the alternative hypothesis (H₁) presents the existence of meaningful effects. Researchers establish statistical significance through p-values, which demonstrate less than 5% or 1% probability of random results when set at a 0.05 or 0.01 threshold. A statistical test using a p-value of 0.03 indicates significant findings because such results by random chance emerge only three times during 100 trials. The rejection of the null hypothesis occurs when p < 0.05, proving that the observed effect exists (Kline, 2005).
Correlation
The correlation measurement helps establish how strong and which way two variables relate to each other through linear patterns. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) described by Kline (2005) operates between -1.00 for strong negative alignment and +1.00 for strong positive linkage, while zero represents no association. Parisian study time and test score comparisons yield an r = 0.70 correlation that indicates strong matching trends, whereas a partnership between stress and job satisfaction demonstrates an r = -0.50 relationship associated with moderate opposition. The correlation between variables cannot determine causality because outside factors could influence the measured relationship (Kline, 2005). The statistical concepts maintain basic significance in psychological assessment to provide valid results with reliable interpretability.
Self-Esteem Construct
Self-esteem is how individuals perceive and evaluate themselves. It reflects self-worth and confidence in one’s abilities. High self-esteem is linked to resilience and positive mental health. Low self-esteem can contribute to anxiety and depression. Psychological assessments often measure self-esteem using self-report scales like the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES).
Reference
Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing : a practical approach to design and evaluation / Theresa J.B. Kline. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385693