In your original post of approximately 200 words, you will need to describe two rhetorical situations – one appropriate for a Toulmin argument and one appropriate for a Rogerian argument. In other words, describe a rhetorical situation suited for a Toulmin Model of Argument and one for a Rogerian argument.
As a reminder, here is the information requested when describing a rhetorical situation:
1. What is your topic?
2. WHAT WOULD BE YOUR GENRE? (COURSE ASSIGNMENT, COLLEGE NEWSPAPER, LETTER TO EDITOR, ETC.)
3. Who is your audience? Be specific.
(Let’s assume your purpose is to persuade since we are discussing argumentation).
Again, do not forget to describe TWO scenarios – one suited for a Toulmin argument and one for a Rogerian argument. Please indicate why you have chosen the argument model to fit the rhetorical situation you have described.
You will not be able to see the other posts until you submit your own post. Once you do, please respond to at least one of your colleague’s posts in about 100 words. Please be sure that you provide a substantial response.
This is the student post:
A Toulmin argument on Urban Heat Islands in Developing Countries allows a structured presentation of the issue. Claims such as the urgent need for sustainable urban development to mitigate urban heat islands, supported by evidence from studies conducted in various developing cities, would be essential. The argument would be principles of sustainable urban planning backed by data indicating the adverse effects of urban heat islands on public health. A Toulmin approach ensures a systematic and evidence-based argument, essential when addressing an audience of professionals who rely on data-driven decision-making in urban planning. Given that the audience will primarily be Urban planners, policymakers, and environmental scientists from developed and developing nations, a Toulmin model provides a logical framework that appeals to their analytical mindset, encouraging them to consider the proposed policies based on solid evidence.
A Rogerian argument is well-suited for the Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health in Indigenous Communities as it emphasizes empathy, understanding, and finding common ground. The focus would be on acknowledging the unique cultural and environmental challenges indigenous communities face due to climate change. By recognizing their perspectives and experiences, the argument can gently introduce scientific findings regarding the impact of climate change on mental health. A Rogerian approach encourages dialogue and mutual understanding, making it practical for situations where trust and respect for cultural differences are crucial, such as in indigenous communities addressing sensitive topics like mental health. In this instance, it is essential to approach the subject with sensitivity and respect, allowing the audience’s experiences and concerns to shape the conversation, thereby fostering a sense of shared understanding and cooperation.