Read the assignment from the text. Answer the following two (2) questions:
Prepare a piece that discusses the journey of the admissibility of scientific evidence as reflected in the holdings of: Frye, Daubert, and Kumbo. Further, discuss whether you believe the current applicable test strikes a proper balance for the admissibility of scientific evidence. If not, why not?
Define "social fact." How are social facts generally admitted during trial and what are the general threshold requirements for admissibility?
As always, your discussion should properly analyze the issue. Perfunctory responses will not get full credit.