Rigorous primary studies and meta-analyses have found that rehabilitative correctional interventions/treatment programs can significantly reduce recidivism. However, these same studies have found that there is a great deal of variability regarding the effectiveness of rehabilitative interventions. What does this variability mean for practice? How does the risk, needs, responsivity (RNR) model help make sense of this variability? Finally, given this reality, how should rehabilitative programs be implemented in contemporary correctional practice to maximize their recidivism reduction potential?
Recent Posts
- Your perception of DNA evidence being on a jury If you were a member of a ?jury:?would you have a general idea of the importance or lack of ?im
- You are a former pilot, and you are now the controller of a division of TransGlobal Airlines, a large organization that operates a fleet of cor
- What is a common label for employee behavior that you’ve heard used in organizational contexts? How would you pinpoint the behavior (or output
- What does it mean to differentiate in the classroom? How do you plan to differentiate instruction, resources, or the environment to meet the le
- Utilize the Gap Analysis Tool Adapted from AHRQ to develop a gap analysis on an identified best practice (see template tool accessed via link b