Rigorous primary studies and meta-analyses have found that rehabilitative correctional interventions/treatment programs can significantly reduce recidivism. However, these same studies have found that there is a great deal of variability regarding the effectiveness of rehabilitative interventions. What does this variability mean for practice? How does the risk, needs, responsivity (RNR) model help make sense of this variability? Finally, given this reality, how should rehabilitative programs be implemented in contemporary correctional practice to maximize their recidivism reduction potential?
Recent Posts
- Discuss a time when you may have had difficulty discussing an issue related to oppression, privilege, or intersectionality due to struggles with
- A physician on staff tells you about a study that they are doing on their patients. They hope to have the study published and to receive a grant
- Identify the theoretical framework in each article in your annotated bibliography. If not noted there, return to the article and see if a theory
- How will you decide on an appropriate theoretical framework for your study? What questions might you ask to ensure the best foundation for answer
- If you are collecting phone or face-to-face interviews, the audio recorder is the most important tool for ensuring accuracy in capturing the inte