Chat with us, powered by LiveChat SCS 224 Ethical Responsibilities and Professionalism Journal - Writeden

The assignment

Ethical Responsibilities and Professionalism Journal Guidelines and Rubric.html

SCS 224 Ethical Responsibilities and Professionalism Journal Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

It is important to be aware of stakeholders’ rights and wishes when dealing with ethical conflicts in the field or during research. Keep the following questions in mind as you write this week’s journal entry: What is an institutional review board (IRB), and what is its purpose? Do you think it actually works? Why, or why not?

Prompt

Choose one of three ethical dilemmas and write a response in your journal. As you respond to the specific ethical dilemma, consider the role of the IRB. What is an IRB? What is its purpose? Would the IRB protect everyone involved in your research? If so, how?

You are an epidemiologist and you have just proposed a grant to a large government institution. After a few months of waiting, you discover that the government has accepted your proposal—this is the research offer of a lifetime. You will receive the entirety of your requested funds ($250,000) to run a three-year project examining the differences of rural homes’ and urban dwellings’ access to clean water sources in Haiti and its impacts to overall human health. During your final year of research, you realize that after your results are published, the study sites will be greatly impacted—people’s homes will be torn down and they will be forced to move from lands that are special to their culture. You know that getting access to clean water will eventually help their families survive, but the present generations will likely suffer the consequences of government relocation. What do you do?

You are a sociologist studying gang violence on the fringes of a large American urban city. The people you interview and their families have a high likelihood to suffer increased levels of violence if they are seen communicating with you. Your reports must be published and interviewees must sign a consent form, so there is potential for word to spread of their involvement with you and your institution. You believe that the neighborhood will undoubtedly benefit from a social scientific examination of how violence affects childhood development, but you are putting yourself and other families at risk in the present. How do you choose to conduct your research and gather data in such a high-risk area?

Need a hand putting it together?

Get it planned, written & polished — the right way.

WriteDen’s expert tutors help you plan, structure and polish your own paper — 100% human-written, never AI, and checked for plagiarism.

Plagiarism-free · On-time delivery · Money-back guarantee

You are a cultural anthropologist who has been looking for a research position for six months, and your finances are stretched to the breaking point. To your surprise, you are contacted by a major network TV company for a funded opportunity to document the “untouched tribes” of Brazil. With the approval of the Brazilian government already established, do you make contact with a group of peoples who have not had interaction with much (if any) of the Western world in order to be published and receive a substantial paycheck? Do you deny the opportunity altogether knowing that someone else will likely fill your position? Do you accept in hopes that you will make contact as sensitively as possible, not trusting someone else to do it? Is it even your place to protect the cultural environment of people you do not know?

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

Institutional review board

Does the IRB work?

Ethical dilemma

What to Submit

Journal entries should be one page in length. All citations should be completed using APA format.

AI Usage

If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow these AI usage guidelines. You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in this Shapiro Library guide.

This SCS 224 journal asks you to respond to one of three research-ethics dilemmas while explaining what an Institutional Review Board (IRB) is, its purpose, and whether it would protect everyone involved — and whether you think IRBs actually work. Reason through the dilemma with the IRB’s role in mind.

Key takeaways

  • An IRB reviews research to protect human subjects’ rights and welfare.
  • Its purpose: ensure informed consent, minimize risk, and uphold ethics.
  • Apply it to your chosen dilemma — would it protect everyone?
  • Give your honest view on whether IRBs actually work, with reasoning.
  • Reflect on stakeholders’ rights and wishes.

What an IRB is and does

Define the Institutional Review Board: a committee that reviews proposed research involving human subjects to ensure it’s ethical — protecting participants through informed consent, risk minimization, fair subject selection, and privacy. Its purpose is to prevent harm and uphold ethical standards (rooted in Belmont principles: respect for persons, beneficence, justice).

Respond to the dilemma

Choose one of the three dilemmas (e.g., the epidemiologist’s proposed study) and work through the ethical conflict — the competing stakeholder rights and wishes. Consider whether and how an IRB would protect everyone involved, and where gaps might remain.

Do IRBs actually work?

Give your reasoned view — IRBs provide essential oversight but face criticism (bureaucracy, inconsistency, limits with certain research). Support your position.

Format

Write it as a reflective journal entry and cite your sources.