The purpose of this work is to compare the role of the NCSBN (National Council of State Boards of Nursing) and TBON (Texas Board of Nursing) in licensure and o

Criteria/

Points

Excellent

Good

Needs Improvement

Unsatisfactory

Content Quality and Relevance

(40%)

· Provides a comprehensive and accurate comparison of the mission, vision, and values of the NCSBN and Texas BON.

· Clearly delineates the roles and influence of each organization on nursing licensure.

· Supports discussion with specific examples and evidence. (7.2-8 pts)

· Addresses the mission, vision, and values of the NCSBN and Texas BON but with less depth or detail.

· Identifies the roles and influence of both organizations on nursing licensure, though analysis may lack nuance. (6-7.1 pts)

· Provides a superficial or incomplete comparison of the mission, vision, and values of the NCSBN and Texas BON.

· Minimal use of evidence to support claims. (4.8-5.9 pts)

· Fails to address the mission, vision, and values of the organizations.

· Lacks a clear comparison or analysis of the assigned state board.

· Contains significant inaccuracies or omissions. (0-4.7 pts)

Analysis and Critical Thinking

(40%)

· Demonstrates deep understanding and critical analysis of the roles and influence of the NCSBN and the Texas BON.

· Identifies nuanced similarities and differences with thoughtful interpretation.

· Effectively connects the analysis to broader implications for nursing licensure ( 7.2-8 pts)

· Provides a clear analysis but may lack depth or critical insight.

· Discusses similarities and differences but with limited interpretation or broader context. (6-7.1 pts)

· Offers basic analysis with limited critical thinking or depth.

· Relies heavily on description rather than interpretation. (4.8-5.9 pts)

· Lacks analysis or critical thinking. Primarily descriptive with minimal effort to explore underlying issues. (0-4.7 pts)

Professional Writing and APA Formatting (20%)

· Writing is professional, clear, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.

· Follows APA format consistently, including in-text citations and references.

· Adheres to the required word count (250-500 words). (3.6-4 points)

· Writing is clear but may contain minor grammatical or spelling errors.

· APA format is mostly followed, with minor errors in citations or references.

· Stays within the word count range. (250-500 words). (3.2-3.5 points)

· Writing contains noticeable grammatical or spelling errors that affect readability.

· APA format is inconsistently applied, with multiple errors in citations or references.

· Word count is outside the required range (25 words above or below range) (2.4-3.1 points)

· Writing is unclear or unprofessional, with frequent errors.

· APA formatting is not followed.

· Word count is significantly outside the required range. (more than 25 words above or below the range). (0-2.3 points)

Total Points